State v. Washington

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Washington

503 S.W.3d 293, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1141, 2016 WL 6585980

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 8, 2016

DocketWD 78704

StatusPublished

This text of 503 S.W.3d 293 (State v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Washington, 503 S.W.3d 293, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1141, 2016 WL 6585980 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial, DeAngelo Washington was convicted in the Circuit Court of Saline County of possession of methamphetamine, possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use, and resisting a lawful stop or detention. The circuit court found Washington to be a prior drug offender, and sentenced him to concurrent sentences of thirteen years’ imprisonment for possession of methamphetamine, 90 days’ incarceration for possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia, and one year’s imprisonment for resisting a lawful detention. Washington appeals, claiming that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he possessed methamphetamine and marijuana found in a bedroom of the house in which he was living with his girlfriend. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial, DeAngelo Washington was convicted in the Circuit Court of Saline County of possession of methamphetamine, possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use, and resisting a lawful stop or detention. The circuit court found Washington to be a prior drug offender, and sentenced him to concurrent sentences of thirteen years’ imprisonment for possession of methamphetamine, 90 days’ incarceration for possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia, and one year’s imprisonment for resisting a lawful detention. Washington appeals, claiming that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he possessed methamphetamine and marijuana found in a bedroom of the house in which he was living with his girlfriend. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 S.W.3d 293, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1141, 2016 WL 6585980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-washington-moctapp-2016.