State v. Washington

209 S.W.3d 522, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1971, 2006 WL 3780892
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 S.W.3d 875
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2006·No. No. ED 87069·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Washington appeals the denial of his motion for a new trial, after a jury convicted him of robbery in the first degree under Section 569.020 RSMo 2000, alleging the prosecutor engaged in improper personalization during his opening statement. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[523]*523The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Washington, 209 S.W.3d 522, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1971, 2006 WL 3780892 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

209 S.W.3d 522 (State v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.