State v. Washington

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Washington

987 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 310

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 16, 1999

DocketNo. 74148

StatusPublished

This text of 987 S.W.2d 524 (State v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Washington, 987 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 310 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[525]*525ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Ronald Washington appeals the judgment entered following his jury conviction for second degree trafficking of cocaine base, Section 195.223, RSMo 1994, and possession of marijuana, Section 195.202, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[525]*525ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Ronald Washington appeals the judgment entered following his jury conviction for second degree trafficking of cocaine base, Section 195.223, RSMo 1994, and possession of marijuana, Section 195.202, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

987 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-washington-moctapp-1999.