Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/State v. Washington

State v. Washington

887 S.W.2d 817, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1886, 1994 WL 677864
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 230 →
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 6, 1994·No. Nos. 63283, 64767·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his jury verdict based convictions of assault first degree, tampering in the first degree, receiving stolen property and armed criminal action. He also appeals denial of his post-conviction motion challenging the sentence on the assault conviction. We believe no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and that the ruling on the Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of facts that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. The parties have been furnished with a written státement of the reasons for affirmance.

[818]*818Judgments affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Washington, 887 S.W.2d 817, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1886, 1994 WL 677864 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

887 S.W.2d 817 (State v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.