State v. Washington

411 So. 2d 451, 1982 La. LEXIS 10507
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 26, 1982·No. No. 82-K-0572·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

At the hearing on the discovery motions urged in each of these cases, the trial judge granted the defendant’s motion to discover the names, addresses and telephone numbers of state witnesses, with the precautionary order that the information be used solely for the purpose of preparing a defense. The trial judge relied upon this Court’s decision in State v. Walters, 408 So.2d 1337 (La.1982).

In the cases before us there was no determination that there exist peculiar and distinctive reasons why fundamental fairness dictates discovery. Nor does the record reflect any such showing by the defendant. Therefore we reverse the ruling of the trial judge and return the cases to the district court for re-trial of the discovery motions.

MARCUS, J., concurs and assigns reasons. BLANCHE, J., concurs and assigns reasons. WATSON, J., concurs, and notes that Walters should be very narrowly construed being a unique situation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Washington, 411 So. 2d 451, 1982 La. LEXIS 10507 (La. 1982).

411 So. 2d 451 (State v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Chenier
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2026
State of Louisiana v. Michael Edwin Vice
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2023
State of Louisiana v. Eldridge Tezano, Jr.
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013
State v. Harper
53 So. 3d 1263 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2010)
State v. Weathersby
29 So. 3d 499 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2010)
State v. Vampran
491 So. 2d 1356 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
State v. Williams
458 So. 2d 1315 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)
State v. Hines
422 So. 2d 1297 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1982)