State v. Wascom

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Wascom

174 So. 348, 187 La. 257, 1937 La. LEXIS 1165

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 26, 1937·No. No. 34312.·Published

Opinion

ROGERS, Justice.

The defendant, Newman Wascom, was convicted and sentenced for the crime of cattle stealing. There was no appearance for defendant before this court and no briei filed in his behalf. The record contains no demurrer, .no motion to quash, no motion for a new trial, and no motion in arrest of judgment. Nor does it contain a bill of exception to any ruling of the trial judge. We have examined the record and do not find any error in the proceeding. The .record, therefore, presents nothing for this court to review.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction ' and sentence appealed from are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROGERS, Justice.

The defendant, Newman Wascom, was convicted and sentenced for the crime of cattle stealing. There was no appearance for defendant before this court and no briei filed in his behalf. The record contains no demurrer, .no motion to quash, no motion for a new trial, and no motion in arrest of judgment. Nor does it contain a bill of exception to any ruling of the trial judge. We have examined the record and do not find any error in the proceeding. The .record, therefore, presents nothing for this court to review.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction ' and sentence appealed from are affirmed.

State v. Wascom, 174 So. 348, 187 La. 257, 1937 La. LEXIS 1165 (La. 1937).

Pincite

174 So. 348 (State v. Wascom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.