State v. Warren

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Warren

204 S.E.2d 553, 21 N.C. App. 449, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1835

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedMay 1, 1974

DocketNo. 7418SC333

StatusPublished

This text of 204 S.E.2d 553 (State v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Warren, 204 S.E.2d 553, 21 N.C. App. 449, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1835 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

VAUGHN, Judge.

The only exception in the record is to the entry of the judgment. This exception presents the question of whether error appears on the face of the record. State v. Williams, 235 N.C. 429, 70 S.E. 2d 1. Defendant was tried on a proper indictment in a court of competent jurisdiction. The verdict supports the judgment, and the sentence imposed is within the applicable statutory limits. We find no error.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Morris concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAUGHN, Judge.

The only exception in the record is to the entry of the judgment. This exception presents the question of whether error appears on the face of the record. State v. Williams, 235 N.C. 429, 70 S.E. 2d 1. Defendant was tried on a proper indictment in a court of competent jurisdiction. The verdict supports the judgment, and the sentence imposed is within the applicable statutory limits. We find no error.

No error.

Judges Campbell and Morris concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 S.E.2d 553, 21 N.C. App. 449, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-warren-ncctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack