State v. Warner

4 Ind. 604, 1853 Ind. LEXIS 237
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 31, 1853
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ind. 604 (State v. Warner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Warner, 4 Ind. 604, 1853 Ind. LEXIS 237 (Ind. 1853).

Opinion

Roache, J.

Warner was convicted with one Gilpin for an affray. The prosecutor entered a nolle prosequi as to Gilpin. The indictment charged that Warner and Gilpin, “in Washington township, in said county of Morgan, with force and arms, being then and there unlawfully assembled and gathered together in a warlike manner, then and there at a public place in said township in said county, did then and there unlawfully, by agreement, fight and make an affray with each other,” &c.

On motion of Warner, the indictment was quashed, on the ground that the particular place, as the town or farm where the affray took place, was not specified.

This was unnecessary. It was sufficient to allege the off ence to have been committed in the county of Morgan, without specifying the township. Morris v. The State, 1 Blackf. 37.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. State
1 Blackf. 37 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1819)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Ind. 604, 1853 Ind. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-warner-ind-1853.