State v. Ware
8 N.E.3d 962, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1491
Opinion
Portage App. No. 2013-P-0011, 2013-Ohio-5833. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ entry filed March 5, 2014:
[1492]*1492“When the imposition of a mandatory prison term is statutorily-mandated for a specific felony offense, is the trial court permitted to impose a total prison term within the maximum allowed, only a portion of which is mandatory under the statute?”
The conflict case is State v. Thomas, 3d Dist. Allen No. 1-04-88, 2005-Ohio-4616.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ware, 8 N.E.3d 962, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1491 (Ohio 2014).
8 N.E.3d 962 (State v. Ware) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ware
2013 Ohio 5833 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
State v. Thomas, Unpublished Decision (9-6-2005)
2005 Ohio 4616 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)