State v. Ware

466 A.2d 29, 1983 Me. LEXIS 809
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedOctober 12, 1983
StatusPublished

This text of 466 A.2d 29 (State v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ware, 466 A.2d 29, 1983 Me. LEXIS 809 (Me. 1983).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Lance Merle Ware appeals his conviction of robbery with a dangerous weapon in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 651 (1983). His sole contention on appeal is that, during rebuttal, the prosecutor improperly commented on defendant’s failure to testify, requiring the vacating of the jury verdict and the granting of a new trial. After careful review of the rebuttal argument, we find that the prosecutor’s comments cannot be interpreted as referring to defendant’s silence at trial. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction entered by the Superior Court.

The entry is

Appeal denied.

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 651
Maine § 651

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 A.2d 29, 1983 Me. LEXIS 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ware-me-1983.