State v. Ware

Court of Appeals of Maryland

State v. Ware

819 A.2d 1030, 373 Md. 550

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided August 22, 2002·No. 50 Sept. Term 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Court having considered the State’s application for leave to appeal from the grant of post conviction relief in a capital case, Darris Ware’s application for leave to appeal, and the answers filed thereto, in the above-entitled case, it is this 22nd day of August, 2002,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that both applications be, and they are hereby, DENIED, and it is further

ORDERED, that, as to the belated appeal ordered by the Circuit Court on the single issue of whether Darris Ware had received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, consideration of that appeal is deferred pending the new sentencing *551 proceeding, and the belated appeal will be considered with the appeal, if any, from the decision in the sentencing hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court having considered the State’s application for leave to appeal from the grant of post conviction relief in a capital case, Darris Ware’s application for leave to appeal, and the answers filed thereto, in the above-entitled case, it is this 22nd day of August, 2002,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that both applications be, and they are hereby, DENIED, and it is further

ORDERED, that, as to the belated appeal ordered by the Circuit Court on the single issue of whether Darris Ware had received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, consideration of that appeal is deferred pending the new sentencing *551 proceeding, and the belated appeal will be considered with the appeal, if any, from the decision in the sentencing hearing.

State v. Ware, 819 A.2d 1030, 373 Md. 550 (Md. 2002).

Pincite

819 A.2d 1030 (State v. Ware) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related