State v. Wardlow
This text of 356 So. 2d 901 (State v. Wardlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, the State of Florida, contends that the trial court erred in granting the motion to dismiss filed by appellee/defend-ant, Johnny Wardlow. We agree.
After appellee filed a motion to dismiss a one-count information charging him with making a false statement for the purpose of obtaining food stamps, in violation of Section 409.325, Florida Statutes (Supp.1976), the state filed a sworn traverse which specifically denied the factual allegations contained in the motion. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190(d) states in pertinent part: “A motion to dismiss under paragraph (c)(4) of this rule shall be denied if the state files a traverse which denies under oath a material fact alleged in the motion to dismiss.” Accordingly, the trial court should have denied the motion, and it was error to dismiss the information. See State v. News-Press Publishing Co., 338 So.2d 1313 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).
We reverse the trial court’s order and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 So. 2d 901, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wardlow-fladistctapp-1978.