Home/Supreme Court of Florida/State v. Wardell

State v. Wardell

642 So. 2d 745, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 464, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 1449, 1994 WL 513597
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 22, 1994
DocketNo. 83280
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 642 So. 2d 745 (State v. Wardell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Wardell, 642 So. 2d 745, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 464, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 1449, 1994 WL 513597 (Fla. 1994).

Opinion

KOGAN, Justice.

We have for review Wardell v. State, 631 So.2d 1130, 1131 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), in which the district court certified the following question as being of great public importance:

MUST A TRIAL COURT, UPON REVOCATION OF PROBATION, CREDIT PREVIOUS TIME SERVED ON PROBATION TOWARD ANY NEWLY-IMPOSED TERM OF PROBATION SO THAT THE TOTAL PROBATIONARY TERM IS SUBJECT TO THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM FOR A SINGLE OFFENSE?

We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.

We have answered the same question in the affirmative State v. Summers, 642 So.2d 742 (Fla.1994). Because the decision under review is in harmony with our decision in Summers, we approve it.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING and WELLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beagling v. State
667 So. 2d 1019 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Olson v. State
654 So. 2d 304 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
C.A.T. v. State
652 So. 2d 1279 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
642 So. 2d 745, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 464, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 1449, 1994 WL 513597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wardell-fla-1994.