State v. Ward

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Ward

337 A.2d 540, 168 Conn. 662

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 6, 1975·Published

Opinion

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County with proper [663] diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant files his brief on or before June 17, 1975.

Walter D. Flanagan, assistant state’s attorney, for the plaintiff (appellee). Donald F. Zezima, for the defendant (appellant). Argued May 6 decided May 6, 1975

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County with proper [663] diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant files his brief on or before June 17, 1975.

Walter D. Flanagan, assistant state’s attorney, for the plaintiff (appellee). Donald F. Zezima, for the defendant (appellant). Argued May 6 decided May 6, 1975

State v. Ward, 337 A.2d 540, 168 Conn. 662 (Colo. 1975).

Pincite

337 A.2d 540 (State v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.