State v. Wammack

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Wammack

877 So. 2d 989, 2004 La. LEXIS 2351, 2004 WL 1762075

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 13, 2004·No. No. 2003-KK-2901·Published

Opinions

In re Walker, H. Clay; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 229,043; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 38146-KW.

Granted. The trial court is instructed to conduct a hearing to determine whether sufficient funds are available to reimburse appointed counsel for his estimated overhead and out-of-pocket costs as required by State v. Wigley, 624 So.2d 425, 429 (La.1993). The district court shall take into account counsel’s responsibility for his portion of his firm’s overhead directly related to the representation of this defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Walker, H. Clay; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 229,043; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 38146-KW.

Granted. The trial court is instructed to conduct a hearing to determine whether sufficient funds are available to reimburse appointed counsel for his estimated overhead and out-of-pocket costs as required by State v. Wigley, 624 So.2d 425, 429 (La.1993). The district court shall take into account counsel’s responsibility for his portion of his firm’s overhead directly related to the representation of this defendant.

State v. Wammack, 877 So. 2d 989, 2004 La. LEXIS 2351, 2004 WL 1762075 (La. 2004).

Pincite

877 So. 2d 989 (State v. Wammack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related