State v. Walters
This text of State v. Walters (State v. Walters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 548A00-2
Filed 25 September 2020
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
v. CHRISTINA SHEA WALTERS
On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) to review an order
dismissing defendant’s motion for appropriate relief filed pursuant to the Racial
Justice Act entered on 25 January 2017 by Judge W. Erwin Spainhour in Superior
Court, Cumberland County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 26 August 2019.
Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Danielle Marquis Elder, Senior Deputy Attorney General, and Jonathan P. Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellee.
Shelagh R. Kenney and Malcolm Ray Hunter Jr. for defendant-appellant.
James E. Coleman Jr. for Charles Becton, Charles Daye, Valerie Johnson, Irving L. Joyner, Floyd B. McKissick Jr., Cressie H. Thigpen Jr., and Fred J. Williams, amici curiae.
Jeremy M. Falcone, Paul F. Khoury, Robert L. Walker, and Madeline J. Cohen for Former State and Federal Prosecutors, amicus curiae.
Carlos E. Mahoney, Jin Hee Lee, and W. Kerrel Murray for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., amicus curiae.
Janet Moore for National Association for Public Defense, amicus curiae.
James E. Williams Jr., Burton Craige, and Bidish Sarma for North Carolina Advocates for Justice, amicus curiae.
Grady Jessup for North Carolina Association of Black Lawyers, amicus curiae. STATE V. WALTERS
Opinion of the Court
Cynthia F. Adcock for North Carolina Council of Churches, amicus curiae.
Lisa A. Bakale-Wise and Irving Joyner for North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, amicus curiae.
Professors Robert P. Mosteller & John Charles Boger, amici curiae.
Robert P. Mosteller for Retired Members of the North Carolina Judiciary, amici curiae.
Joseph Blocher for Social Scientists, amici curiae.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in State v. Robinson, No. 411A94-6, 2020 WL 4726680
(N.C. Aug. 14, 2020), the decision of the trial court is vacated and this case is
remanded to the Superior Court, Cumberland County, for the reinstatement of
defendant’s sentence of life imprisonment without parole.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
-2- Justice ERVIN concurring in the result.
If the Court were addressing for the first time the issue of whether the trial
court’s order should be reversed and the sentence of life imprisonment imposed upon
defendant by Judge Spainhour reinstated on double jeopardy and related grounds, I
would dissent from that decision and hold, for the reasons stated in my dissenting
opinion in State v. Robinson, No. 41194-6, 2020WL 4726680 (N.C. Aug. 14, 2020), that
the trial court’s order should be reversed and this case remanded to the Superior
Court, Cumberland County, for a new Racial Justice Act proceeding in accordance
with this Court’s decision in State v. Ramseur, 374 N.C. 658, 843 S.E.2d 106 (2020),
and our 2015 order in this case. The decision of the majority in Robinson is, however,
the law of North Carolina to which I am now bound. For this reason, I concur in the
result reached by the Court in this case.
Justice DAVIS joins in this concurring opinion. Justice NEWBY dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinions in State v. Robinson, No.
411A94-6, 2020 WL 4726680 (N.C. Aug. 14, 2020), and State v. Ramseur, 374 N.C.
658, 843 S.E.2d 106 (2020), I respectfully dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Walters, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-walters-nc-2020.