State v. Walters
This text of State v. Walters (State v. Walters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) ID No: 2309010713 ) DEMPSEY WALTERS, ) ) Defendant. )
Submitted: January 13, 2025 Decided: January 16, 2025
ORDER
Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for a Sentence Reduction DENIED
1. Defendant, Dempsey Walters, filed the instant Motion for Sentence Reduction
on January 13, 2025.1 Defendant asks this Court to modify his sentence based
on the primary mitigating factor brought by Defendant which was the Post-
Traumatic Stress Disorder he suffered from at the time of the incident this
case concerns.2
2. On April 5, 2024, Defendant pled guilty to one (1) count of Deprivation of
Civil Rights, two (2) counts of Official Misconduct, one (1) count of Assault
Second Degree, and two (2) counts of Assault Third Degree.3
1 Docket Item (“D.I.”) 36. 2 Id. 3 D.I. 33. 3. On October 15, 2024, Defendant was sentenced to five (5) years at Level V
suspended after three (3) months for two (2) years at Level III for Assault
Second Degree; five (5) years at Level V suspended after six (6) months for
one (1) year at Level III for Deprivation of Civil Rights; one (1) year at Level
V suspended after three (3) months for one (1) year at Level III for Assault
Third; one (1) year at Level V suspended for one (1) year at Level III for
Assault Third; one (1) year at Level V suspended for one (1) year at Level III
for Official Misconduct; and one (1) year at Level V suspended for one (1)
year at Level III for Official Misconduct.4
4. Under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(b), “[t]he court may reduce a sentence
of imprisonment on a motion made within 90 days after the sentence is
imposed.”5 If the motion is filed later than 90 days after imposition of the
sentence, the Court will only consider the motion “in extraordinary
circumstances.”6 The Court may consider a sentence reduction motion
“without presentation, hearing, or argument.”7
5. Defendant’s sentence was imposed on October 15, 2024, and Defendant filed
the instant Motion on January 13, 2025. Therefore, Defendant complies with
the 90-day filing period required by Rule 35(b).
4 Id. 5 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 35(b). 6 Id. 7 Id. 6. After careful review of Defendant’s Motion, the entire record of the case, and
all sentencing information provided, Defendant’s Post-Traumatic Stress
Disorder when juxtaposed to the aggravating factors does not warrant a
sentence reduction.
IT IS SO ORDERED that your motion for reduction or modification of sentence is DENIED.
/s/ Francis J. Jones, Jr. Francis J. Jones, Jr., Judge
cc: Original to Prothonotary John S. Malik, Esquire Daniel McBride, Deputy Attorney General
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Walters, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-walters-delsuperct-2025.