State v. Walsh
84 A. 42, 76 N.H. 581, 1912 N.H. LEXIS 99
Opinion
It is not customary for the court to quash an indictment merely because it may have been produced by the testimony of an incompetent witness. Commonwealth v. Woodward, 157 Mass. 516; State v. Fassett, 16 Conn. 457; 17 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law 1283, note 7; 20 Cyc. 1347, note 18.
Exception overruled.
All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Walsh, 84 A. 42, 76 N.H. 581, 1912 N.H. LEXIS 99 (N.H. 1912).
84 A. 42 (State v. Walsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Blake
305 A.2d 300 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1973)
State v. Lambertino
180 A. 426 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935)
State v. Fox
182 S.W. 906 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1916)