State v. Wallace

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Wallace

477 P.2d 907, 4 Or. App. 362, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 454

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedDecember 10, 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 477 P.2d 907 (State v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wallace, 477 P.2d 907, 4 Or. App. 362, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 454 (Or. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

Defendant, having pleaded guilty to attempted second-degree homicide, later moved to withdraw his plea. The trial court denied his motion and sentenced him to eight years’ imprisonment.

1, 2. On appeal defendant assigns as error the trial court’s failure to grant his motion. On direct appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a plea of guilty, the scope of review is limited to the issue of the excessiveness of the sentence. OES 138.050; State v. Slopak, 3 Or App 532, 475 P2d 421 (1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

Defendant, having pleaded guilty to attempted second-degree homicide, later moved to withdraw his plea. The trial court denied his motion and sentenced him to eight years’ imprisonment.

1, 2. On appeal defendant assigns as error the trial court’s failure to grant his motion. On direct appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a plea of guilty, the scope of review is limited to the issue of the excessiveness of the sentence. OES 138.050; State v. Slopak, 3 Or App 532, 475 P2d 421 (1970).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 P.2d 907, 4 Or. App. 362, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wallace-orctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack