State v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Wallace

963 So. 2d 380, 2007 La. LEXIS 1780, 2007 WL 2460183

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 31, 2007

DocketNo. 2006-KH-2555

StatusPublished

This text of 963 So. 2d 380 (State v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wallace, 963 So. 2d 380, 2007 La. LEXIS 1780, 2007 WL 2460183 (La. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted. Relator’s sentence is amended to delete the term “without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence” from his sentence. The trial court exceeded its authority when it imposed a 12-year sentence for aggravated incest, pursuant to a plea agreement, without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence. The court-accepted plea agreement between relator and the state did not include any provision that the sentence be served without benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence and the penalty provisions of R.S. 14:78.1(D) do not provide for such a term. As such, the trial court erred by imposing this illegal condition as part of the sentence. Cf. State v. Terrebonne, 01-2632, p. 3 (La.App. 1st Cir.6/21/02), 822 So.2d 149, 151 (remand for resentencing required for defendant who pled guilty, pursuant to plea agreement, to offense of aggravated incest, when trial court’s imposition of sentence for such offense was more onerous than that called for by the terms of court-accepted plea agreement, as trial court ordered that sentence be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence, and plea agreement did not contain such a condition).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted. Relator’s sentence is amended to delete the term “without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence” from his sentence. The trial court exceeded its authority when it imposed a 12-year sentence for aggravated incest, pursuant to a plea agreement, without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence. The court-accepted plea agreement between relator and the state did not include any provision that the sentence be served without benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence and the penalty provisions of R.S. 14:78.1(D) do not provide for such a term. As such, the trial court erred by imposing this illegal condition as part of the sentence. Cf. State v. Terrebonne, 01-2632, p. 3 (La.App. 1st Cir.6/21/02), 822 So.2d 149, 151 (remand for resentencing required for defendant who pled guilty, pursuant to plea agreement, to offense of aggravated incest, when trial court’s imposition of sentence for such offense was more onerous than that called for by the terms of court-accepted plea agreement, as trial court ordered that sentence be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence, and plea agreement did not contain such a condition).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

963 So. 2d 380, 2007 La. LEXIS 1780, 2007 WL 2460183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wallace-la-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack