State v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Wallace

256 So. 2d 428, 260 La. 419, 1972 La. LEXIS 5526

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 4, 1972

DocketNo. 51766

StatusPublished

This text of 256 So. 2d 428 (State v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wallace, 256 So. 2d 428, 260 La. 419, 1972 La. LEXIS 5526 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of simple burglary. LSA-R.S. 14:62. He appeals.

The defendant reserved and perfected one bill of exceptions to the trial judge’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict based upon the alleged insufficiency of evidence. We have held that our state constitution prevents consideration of such a motion for a directed verdict. LSA-Const. Art. 19, Sec. 9; State v. Williams, 258 La. 801, 248 So.2d 295 (1971). We find no error.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was convicted of simple burglary. LSA-R.S. 14:62. He appeals.

The defendant reserved and perfected one bill of exceptions to the trial judge’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict based upon the alleged insufficiency of evidence. We have held that our state constitution prevents consideration of such a motion for a directed verdict. LSA-Const. Art. 19, Sec. 9; State v. Williams, 258 La. 801, 248 So.2d 295 (1971). We find no error.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 So. 2d 428, 260 La. 419, 1972 La. LEXIS 5526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wallace-la-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack