State v. Walker
40 Tex. 485
Opinion
The court erred in sustaining the motion to quash the indictment. It contained every necessary averment for a valid indictment, as has been repeatedly decided by this court. (See State v. Croft, 15 Texas, 576; State v. Hedrick, 35 Texas, 485; State v. Killough, 32 Texas, 77; State v. Peters, 36 Texas, 325; Martin v. The State, decided at the present term.)
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Walker, 40 Tex. 485 (Tex. 1874).
40 Tex. 485 (State v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burton v. State
3 Tex. Ct. App. 408 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)
Nash v. State
2 Tex. Ct. App. 362 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)
Porter v. State
1 Tex. Ct. App. 394 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1876)
Mayfield v. State
44 Tex. 59 (Texas Supreme Court, 1875)