State v. Walker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 366 S.C. 643
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided May 22, 2003·No. 2003-UP-368·Unpublished

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State,        Respondent,

v.

John Daniel Walker,        Appellant.


Appeal From Richland County
L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-368
Submitted March 26, 2003 – Filed May 22, 2003


APPEAL DISMISSED


Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia; Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant John Daniel Walker was indicted for first- degree burglary, strong arm robbery, and two counts of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN).  The trial court sentenced him to eighteen years for burglary, fifteen years for strong arm robbery and ten years for each count of ABHAN.  Counsel for Walker attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Walker did not file a pro se response.

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Owens’ appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON, and HUFF, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Walker, (S.C. Ct. App. 2003).

State v. Walker (State v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)