State v. Walker
492 P.2d 801, 7 Or. App. 570
This text of 492 P.2d 801 (State v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Walker, 492 P.2d 801, 7 Or. App. 570 (Or. Ct. App. 1972).
Opinion
This case presents the same question as State v. Bishop, 7 Or App 558, 492 P2d 509 (1972). For the reasons stated in Bishop, we conclude: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a motion to exclude witnesses in that the record contains no reason for this refusal; and (2) we cannot affirmatively say that the defendant was not prejudiced thereby.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Bishop
492 P.2d 509 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1972)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
492 P.2d 801, 7 Or. App. 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-walker-orctapp-1972.