State v. Walker
492 P.2d 801, 7 Or. App. 570
Opinion
This case presents the same question as State v. Bishop, 7 Or App 558, 492 P2d 509 (1972). For the reasons stated in Bishop, we conclude: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a motion to exclude witnesses in that the record contains no reason for this refusal; and (2) we cannot affirmatively say that the defendant was not prejudiced thereby.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Walker, 492 P.2d 801, 7 Or. App. 570 (Or. Ct. App. 1972).
492 P.2d 801 (State v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bishop
492 P.2d 509 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1972)