State v. . Walker

94 N.C. 857
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Merrimon, J.

(after stating the facts). This case is substantially like that of State v. Lyon, 93 N. C., 575. No appeal lay from the order of the justice of the peace, requiring the defendant with sureties to enter into recognizance to keep the peace. The Court ought, therefore, to have granted the motion to dismiss the supposed appeal. It ought not to have made the order discharging the defendant, because the proceeding was not in the Superior Court. It remained before the justice of the peace to be proceeded in according to law.

The order discharging the defendant must be reversed, and an order entered dismissing the supposed appeal.

To that end let this opinion be certified to the Superior Court. It is so ordered.

Error. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Walker, 94 N.C. 857 (N.C. 1886).

94 N.C. 857 (State v. . Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herz v. Hamilton
198 Iowa 154 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1924)
State v. Gregory
118 N.C. 1199 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)