State v. Walker
This text of 439 S.W.3d 851 (State v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Quentin Walker (‘Walker”) appeals from the judgment of conviction by the trial court, after a jury found him guilty of one count of attempted burglary in the first degree and one count of property damage in the second degree.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no plain error. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 S.W.3d 851, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 955, 2014 WL 4290440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-walker-moctapp-2014.