State v. Walker

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Walker

382 S.W.3d 244, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1372, 2012 WL 5306358

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 30, 2012·No. No. WD 74057·Published

Opinion

[245] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Demun Walker appeals his conviction following a jury trial for committing violence against an employee of the department of corrections, section 217.885, RSMo 2000, and sentence to fifteen years imprisonment. He claims insufficient evidence was presented to support the conviction. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[245] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Demun Walker appeals his conviction following a jury trial for committing violence against an employee of the department of corrections, section 217.885, RSMo 2000, and sentence to fifteen years imprisonment. He claims insufficient evidence was presented to support the conviction. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Walker, 382 S.W.3d 244, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1372, 2012 WL 5306358 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

382 S.W.3d 244 (State v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.