State v. Walker

207 S.W.3d 130, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1266, 2006 WL 2474072
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 364
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 2006·No. No. WD 65038·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Walker (‘Walker”) appeals his convictions for murder in the second degree, Section 565.021;1 armed criminal action, Section 571.015; and unlawful use of a weapon, Section 571.030. In two points on appeal, Walker asserts his convictions should be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial because the trial court abused its discretion (1) in overruling defense counsel’s objections to the prosecutor’s questioning Walker about the details of his prior convictions and (2) in overruling the motion for new trial because the State failed to disclose the prior felony convictions of a State’s witness. The court rules the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling defense counsel’s objections to the prosecutor’s questioning Walker about the details of his prior convictions nor in overruling the motion for new trial. Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Walker, 207 S.W.3d 130, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1266, 2006 WL 2474072 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

207 S.W.3d 130 (State v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.