State v. Walker

97 S.W.3d 528, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 2002 WL 1365647
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 364
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 2002·No. No. WD 60131·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted Appellant, Jerry Walker, of forcible rape and forcible sodomy. On appeal, Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying admittance of a tape recording of the alleged victim’s 911 telephone call and the victim’s videotaped statement to the police. He maintains that this evidence would have attacked the victim’s credibility and that he was prejudiced by the court’s refusal to allow him to do so because the victim’s testimony was the only evidence offered in support of his conviction. Thus, the verdict would have been different had he been allowed to attack her credibility by intro[529]*529ducing the 911 tape and her videotaped statement.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Walker, 97 S.W.3d 528, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 2002 WL 1365647 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

97 S.W.3d 528 (State v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.