State v. Walker

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Walker

924 S.W.2d 43, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1007, 1996 WL 310282

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 972 S.W.2d 623 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 1996·No. No. 68388·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced him as a prior offender to a prison term of seven years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced him as a prior offender to a prison term of seven years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Walker, 924 S.W.2d 43, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1007, 1996 WL 310282 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

924 S.W.2d 43 (State v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.