State v. Walker

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Walker

71 S.W. 1133, 171 Mo. 560, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 23

DecidedFebruary 3, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 71 S.W. 1133 (State v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Walker, 71 S.W. 1133, 171 Mo. 560, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 23 (Mo. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

GANTT, P. J.

At the regular May term, 1901, of the Livingston Circuit Court, the defendant was indicted for robbery of John P. Cox. The indictment is drawn under section 1893, Revised Statutes 1899,- and properly charges robbery in the first degree. The jury convicted the defendant and assessed his punishment at five years in the penitentiary. The defendant was sentenced in accordance with the verdict at the May term, 1901, and leave was given him to file a bill of exceptions by the first day of the September term, and appeal was granted to this court. No bill of exceptions was filed and the cause is here on the record proper alone. As already said the indictment was sufficient and all the other steps were taken in the due or orderly course.

[562]*562Nor error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GANTT, P. J.

At the regular May term, 1901, of the Livingston Circuit Court, the defendant was indicted for robbery of John P. Cox. The indictment is drawn under section 1893, Revised Statutes 1899,- and properly charges robbery in the first degree. The jury convicted the defendant and assessed his punishment at five years in the penitentiary. The defendant was sentenced in accordance with the verdict at the May term, 1901, and leave was given him to file a bill of exceptions by the first day of the September term, and appeal was granted to this court. No bill of exceptions was filed and the cause is here on the record proper alone. As already said the indictment was sufficient and all the other steps were taken in the due or orderly course.

[562]*562Nor error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 S.W. 1133, 171 Mo. 560, 1903 Mo. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-walker-moctapp-1903.