State v. Walker

539 A.2d 626, 1988 Me. LEXIS 100
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 1986 Me. LEXIS 758
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided March 31, 1988·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Ronald Walker appeals from convictions of gross sexual misconduct (17-A M.R.S.A. § 253 (1983), amended by P.L. 1985, ch. 247, § 2), assault (17-A M.R.S.A. § 207 (1983)), and unlawful sexual contact (17-A M.R.S.A. § 255 (Supp.1987)) following a jury-waived trial in the Superior Court (Oxford County). In general, Walker’s appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support each conviction and in particular challenges the sufficiency of evidence to support the element of compulsion in the offense of gross sexual misconduct. Examining the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we conclude that the factfinder rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of each offense charged, including the element of compulsion in the offense of gross sexual misconduct. State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985), State v. Ricci, 507 A.2d 587, 588 (Me.1986).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Walker, 539 A.2d 626, 1988 Me. LEXIS 100 (Me. 1988).

539 A.2d 626 (State v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Barry
495 A.2d 825 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)
State v. Ricci
507 A.2d 587 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986)