State v. Waites

969 P.2d 401, 157 Or. App. 721, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 2282
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 23, 1998
Docket94-6014; CA A85666
StatusPublished

This text of 969 P.2d 401 (State v. Waites) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Waites, 969 P.2d 401, 157 Or. App. 721, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 2282 (Or. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for assault and criminal trespass. He first assigns error to the trial court’s acceptance of his waiver of counsel and its decision to permit him to defend himself pro se, because, among other things, the court failed to inform him of the dangers of self-representation. The state concedes that the record fails to show a constitutionally valid waiver of counsel. We accept the concession. Defendant also assigns error to the trial court’s failure to deliver a requested instruction on self-defense. In light of the state’s concession of error on the first assignment of error, however, the second is moot.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
969 P.2d 401, 157 Or. App. 721, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 2282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-waites-orctapp-1998.