State v. Waites

711 N.E.2d 1013, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1419, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2263

• Court: Ohio Supreme Court
• Decided: June 30, 1999
• Docket: 99-706
• Status: Published

Opinion

Lake App. No. 97-L-244. Discretionary appeal allowed; sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 99-286, State v. Williams, Lake App. No. 97-L-191; briefing schedule stayed.

Discretionary appeals in the following causes are allowed; sua sponte, the causes are consolidated with 99-706, supra, and held for the decision in 99-286, State v. Williams, Lake App. No. 97-L-191; briefing schedule stayed: 99-641, State v. Abrams, Lake App. No. 97-L-192; 99-642, State v. Christison, Lake App. No. 98-L-009; 99-643, State v. Agler, Lake App. No. 97-L-203; 99-644, State v. Dairoch, Lake App. No. 97-L-174; 99-645, State v. Cowoski, Lake App. No. 97-L-170; 99-646, State v. Calhoun, Lake App. No. 97-L-221; 99-647, State v. Cwalina, Lake App. No. 97-L-222; 99-648, State v. Boswell, Lake App. No. 98-L-008; 99-649, State v. Burgan, Lake App. No. 97-L-242; 99-655, State v. Greene, Lake App. No. 97-L-220; 99-656, State v. Gau, Lake App. No. 97-L-175; 99-657, State v. Ferguson, Lake App. No. 97-L-241; 99-658, State v. King, Lake App. No. 97-L-173; 99-659, State v. DeCapite, Lake App. No. 98-L-133; 99-660, State v. Hammesfahr, Lake App. No. 97-L-193; 99-661, State v. King, Lake App. No. 97-L-194; 99-662, State v. Drake, Lake App. No. 97-L-176; 99-664, State v. Dietz, Lake App. No. 97-L-204; 99-672, State v. Noble, Lake App. No. 97-L-240; 99-673, State v. New, Lake App. No. 97-L-178; 99-674, State v. Laing, Lake App. No. 97-L-172; 99-675, State v. Malek, Lake App. No. 98-L-010; 99-676, State v. Pope, Lake App. No. 97-L-182; 99-677, State v. Pasko, Lake App. No. 98-L-011; 99-678, State v. McClintick, Lake App. No. 97-L-171; 99-679, State v. Neal, Lake App. No. 97-L-179; 99-680, State v. Lawrinson, Lake App. No. 97-L-205; 99-689, State v. Rivera, Lake App. No. 97-L-181; 99-690, State v. Bayless, Lake App. No. 97-L-257; 99-691, State v. Spatter, Lake App. No. 97-L-183; 99-692, State v. Armington, Lake App. No. 98-L-193; 99-693, State v. Ventresca, Lake App. No. 97-L-243; 99-694, State v. Setina, Lake App. No. 97-L-239; 99-695, State v. Hartman, Lake App. No. 98-L-020; 99-696, State v. Lett, Lake App. No. 97-L-210; 99-698, State v. Swansinger, Lake App. No. 97-L-120; 99-699, State v. Pearson, Lake App. No. 98-L-179; 99-700, State v. Otero, Lake App. No. 97-L-310; 99-701, State v. Crawford, Lake App. No. 97-L-245; 99-702, State v. Taylor, Lake App. No. 97-L-185; 99-703, State v. Vernon, Lake App. No. 97-L-184; 99-704, State v. Gaster, Lake App. No. 97-L-281; 99-705, State v. Semanak, Lake App. No. 97-L-180; 99-707, State v. Butcher, Lake App. No. 97-L-030; 99-708, State v. Will, Lake App. No. 97-L-186; 99-709, State v. Witlicki, Lake App. No. 97-L-189; 99-710, State v. Bayless, Lake App. No. 97-L-256; 99-711, State v. Wolfe, Lake App. No. 97-L-188; 99-712, State v. Woodruff, Lake App. No. 97-L-190; 99-716, State v. McDonald, Lake App. No. 97-L-305; and 99-730, State v. Hill, Lake App. No. 97-L-187.