State v. Wagoner
700 S.E.2d 222
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wagoner. Read the opinion of the Court — 364 N.C. 422 →
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Edward Junior WAGONER.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
*223 Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Yvonne B. Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
Richard E. Jester, Louisburg, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in State v. Bowditch, ___ N.C. ___, 700 S.E.2d 1 (2010), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Chief Justice Parker and Justices Timmons-Goodson and Hudson dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Bowditch, ___ N.C. ___, 700 S.E.2d 1 (2010).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Wagoner, 700 S.E.2d 222 (N.C. 2010).
700 S.E.2d 222 (State v. Wagoner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bowditch
700 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2010)