State v. Wagner

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Wagner

803 N.E.2d 790, 101 Ohio St. 3d 183

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 3, 2004·No. No. 2002-1808·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would affirm the court of appeals. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446, at ¶ 20-22. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would affirm the court of appeals. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446, at ¶ 20-22. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

State v. Wagner, 803 N.E.2d 790, 101 Ohio St. 3d 183 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

803 N.E.2d 790 (State v. Wagner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related