State v. Wagner

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Wagner

803 N.E.2d 790, 101 Ohio St. 3d 183

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 3, 2004

DocketNo. 2002-1808

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 803 N.E.2d 790 (State v. Wagner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wagner, 803 N.E.2d 790, 101 Ohio St. 3d 183 (Ohio 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would affirm the court of appeals. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446, at ¶ 20-22. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would affirm the court of appeals. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Schmitt, 101 Ohio St.3d 79, 2004-Ohio-37, 801 N.E.2d 446, at ¶ 20-22. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

803 N.E.2d 790, 101 Ohio St. 3d 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wagner-ohio-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack