State v. Wagner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Wagner

203 N.W.2d 364, 295 Minn. 533, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1149

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 29, 1972·No. No. 43530·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant, convicted of aggravated robbery, appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial, contending, among other things, that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law on the issue of identity and that his privately retained counsel did not adequately represent him.

We have reviewed the record and proceedings herein and hold that the conviction of defendant is based on evidence which establishes his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; that no prejudicial errors of law occurred at the trial; and that defendant’s counsel adequately represented him.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant, convicted of aggravated robbery, appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial, contending, among other things, that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law on the issue of identity and that his privately retained counsel did not adequately represent him.

We have reviewed the record and proceedings herein and hold that the conviction of defendant is based on evidence which establishes his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; that no prejudicial errors of law occurred at the trial; and that defendant’s counsel adequately represented him.

Affirmed.

State v. Wagner, 203 N.W.2d 364, 295 Minn. 533, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1149 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

203 N.W.2d 364 (State v. Wagner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.