State v. Wagner
This text of 203 N.W.2d 364 (State v. Wagner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, convicted of aggravated robbery, appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial, contending, among other things, that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law on the issue of identity and that his privately retained counsel did not adequately represent him.
We have reviewed the record and proceedings herein and hold that the conviction of defendant is based on evidence which establishes his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; that no prejudicial errors of law occurred at the trial; and that defendant’s counsel adequately represented him.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 N.W.2d 364, 295 Minn. 533, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wagner-minn-1972.