State v. Wade

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wade

998 S.W.2d 95, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 842

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 22, 1999

DocketNo. 71991

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 998 S.W.2d 95 (State v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wade, 998 S.W.2d 95, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 842 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by indictment with one count of murder in the first degree, section 565.020, RSMo 1994, two counts of assault in the first degree, section 560.050, and three counts of armed criminal action, section 571.015. The jury convicted defendant on all counts and he was sentenced to life without eligibility for probation or parole for murder in the first degree, fifteen years for each count of assault in the first degree and thirty years for each count of armed criminal action. The sentences were to run consecutively. Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by indictment with one count of murder in the first degree, section 565.020, RSMo 1994, two counts of assault in the first degree, section 560.050, and three counts of armed criminal action, section 571.015. The jury convicted defendant on all counts and he was sentenced to life without eligibility for probation or parole for murder in the first degree, fifteen years for each count of assault in the first degree and thirty years for each count of armed criminal action. The sentences were to run consecutively. Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

998 S.W.2d 95, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wade-moctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack