State v. W. M. (In re W. M.)
This text of 446 P.3d 579 (State v. W. M. (In re W. M.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*118Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the Department of [Multnomah] County Human Services for a period not to exceed one year. He contends that the trial court erred in finding that, due to an intellectual disability, appellant was a danger to others. See ORS 427.215 ; ORS 427.005(10). The state concedes that the record does not include clear and convincing evidence that appellant's intellectual disability caused him to be a danger to others at the time of the commitment hearing. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
446 P.3d 579, 299 Or. App. 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-w-m-in-re-w-m-orctapp-2019.