State v. W. M. (In re W. M.)

446 P.3d 579, 299 Or. App. 117
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 21, 2019·No. A169781·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*118Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the Department of [Multnomah] County Human Services for a period not to exceed one year. He contends that the trial court erred in finding that, due to an intellectual disability, appellant was a danger to others. See ORS 427.215 ; ORS 427.005(10). The state concedes that the record does not include clear and convincing evidence that appellant's intellectual disability caused him to be a danger to others at the time of the commitment hearing. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. W. M. (In re W. M.), 446 P.3d 579, 299 Or. App. 117 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

446 P.3d 579 (State v. W. M. (In re W. M.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 427.215
Oregon § 427.215
§ 427.005
Oregon § 427.005