State v. Vu

206 P.3d 1211, 228 Or. App. 248
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 29, 2009
Docket870432114 900633278 DA364226 A136944
StatusPublished

This text of 206 P.3d 1211 (State v. Vu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Vu, 206 P.3d 1211, 228 Or. App. 248 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

206 P.3d 1211 (2009)
228 Or. App. 248

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Thoai Dinh VU, aka Giang Van Vu, aka Hung Quoc Nguyen, Defendant-Appellant.

870432114; 900633278; DA364226; A136944.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted April 2, 2009.
Decided April 29, 2009.

Benjamin Haile, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Anna M. Joyce, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded. State v. Branam, 220 Or.App. 255, 185 P.3d 557, rev. den., 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 147 (2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Branam
185 P.3d 557 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
Gaona v. BLACKETTER
205 P.3d 27 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2008)
State v. Thoai Dinh Vu
206 P.3d 1211 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 P.3d 1211, 228 Or. App. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vu-orctapp-2009.