State v. VRANA

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. VRANA

361 S.W.3d 473, 2012 WL 827067, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 315

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 13, 2012

DocketED 96122

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 361 S.W.3d 473 (State v. VRANA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. VRANA, 361 S.W.3d 473, 2012 WL 827067, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 315 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nelson Ray Vrana (“Vrana”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Warren County, the Honorable Keith Sutherland presiding. A jury convicted Vrana of one count of driving while intoxicated and one count of driving with a revoked license. The trial court sentenced Vrana to concurrent sentences of four (4) years in prison on the DWI conviction (as a persistent DWI offender) and one (1) year in prison and a $500.00 fíne on the driving with a revoked license conviction.

On appeal, Vrana argued that the trial erred in overruling defense counsel’s objections to statements made by the prosecutor during voir dire, and in denying the request for mistrial on the same grounds. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nelson Ray Vrana (“Vrana”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Warren County, the Honorable Keith Sutherland presiding. A jury convicted Vrana of one count of driving while intoxicated and one count of driving with a revoked license. The trial court sentenced Vrana to concurrent sentences of four (4) years in prison on the DWI conviction (as a persistent DWI offender) and one (1) year in prison and a $500.00 fíne on the driving with a revoked license conviction.

On appeal, Vrana argued that the trial erred in overruling defense counsel’s objections to statements made by the prosecutor during voir dire, and in denying the request for mistrial on the same grounds. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

361 S.W.3d 473, 2012 WL 827067, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vrana-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack