State v. Vowell
This text of 128 S.E.2d 259 (State v. Vowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the trial in the superior court the State introduced evidence that appellant and her companion checked into the hotel about six o’clock on March 14, 1962. Due to some disturbances in [187]*187which they were involved, the police were called, the defendant and her companion were arrested, and warrants issued. The police officer in charge of the investigation testified as to the confession of the appellant. The appellant contends the confession was unsupported and, therefore, not sufficient to convict. However, the record does not bear out the appellant’s contention. The evidence corroborating the confession was ample. The confession and the corroborating evidence made out a strong ease.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 S.E.2d 259, 258 N.C. 186, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-vowell-nc-1962.