State v. Von Shultz

93 P. 1135, 48 Wash. 698, 1907 Wash. LEXIS 880
Washington Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 1907·No. No. 6875·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal by the state from a judgment of dismissal, after sustaining a demurrer to an information filed under Bal. Code, § 7226 (P. C. § 1794). The demurrer was properly sustained. Wharton,■ Criminal Law (10th ed.), 576; Bishop, Criminal Law, § 794; Prindle v. State, 31 Tex. Cr. 551, 21 S. W. 360, and authorities cited. Honselman v. People, 168 Ill. 172, 48 N. E. 304, and Kelly v. People, 192 Ill. 119, 61 N. E. 425, 85 Am. St. 323, cited by the appellant, arose under a different statute and are not in point. Had the defendant been convicted it might become our duty to further discuss the questions involved, but, inasmuch as the state alone is interested, we feel that its interests will he best subserved by silence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Von Shultz, 93 P. 1135, 48 Wash. 698, 1907 Wash. LEXIS 880 (Wash. 1907).

93 P. 1135 (State v. Von Shultz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prindle v. State
21 S.W. 360 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1893)
Honselman v. People
48 N.E. 304 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1897)
Kelly v. People
61 N.E. 425 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1901)