State v. Von Glon

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Von Glon

26 S.C.L. 187

DecidedFebruary 15, 1841

StatusPublished

This text of 26 S.C.L. 187 (State v. Von Glon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Von Glon, 26 S.C.L. 187 (S.C. Ct. App. 1841).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia, per

O’Neall, J.

The point made in this case was decided by the Constitutional Court, at Columbia, Fall Term, 1818, in the case against Súber, and has ever since been regarded as settled. If, however, it was open for argument, it is plain that under the words of the Act, any trading with a slave, without'a permit from his owner or employer, in buying or selling, for cash or on credit, for much or for little is an indictable offence.

The motion is dismissed.

The whole Court concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia, per

O’Neall, J.

The point made in this case was decided by the Constitutional Court, at Columbia, Fall Term, 1818, in the case against Súber, and has ever since been regarded as settled. If, however, it was open for argument, it is plain that under the words of the Act, any trading with a slave, without'a permit from his owner or employer, in buying or selling, for cash or on credit, for much or for little is an indictable offence.

The motion is dismissed.

The whole Court concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 S.C.L. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-von-glon-scctapp-1841.