State v. Vogt

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Vogt

887 N.E.2d 347, 118 Ohio St. 3d 193

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 2008·No. No. 2007-0670·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Simpkins, 117 Ohio St.3d 420, 2008-Ohio-1197, 884 N.E.2d 568.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents. John D. Ferrero, Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald Mark Caldwell, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, State Public Defender, and Katherine A. Szudy, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Simpkins, 117 Ohio St.3d 420, 2008-Ohio-1197, 884 N.E.2d 568.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents. John D. Ferrero, Stark County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald Mark Caldwell, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, State Public Defender, and Katherine A. Szudy, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant.

State v. Vogt, 887 N.E.2d 347, 118 Ohio St. 3d 193 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

887 N.E.2d 347 (State v. Vogt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related