State v. Vines

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Vines

438 P.3d 126, 193 Wash. 2d 1002

Washington Supreme Court·Decided April 3, 2019·No. No. 96525-1·Published

Opinion

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its April 2, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file the petition for review is granted. The petition for review is denied. The Petitioner's motion to supplement the record is also denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its April 2, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file the petition for review is granted. The petition for review is denied. The Petitioner's motion to supplement the record is also denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

State v. Vines, 438 P.3d 126, 193 Wash. 2d 1002 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

438 P.3d 126 (State v. Vines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.