State v. Vincent

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Vincent

854 S.W.2d 499, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 399, 1993 WL 79254

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 23, 1993·No. Nos. 58844, 60670·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his convictions of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this [500]*500order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his convictions of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this [500]*500order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Vincent, 854 S.W.2d 499, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 399, 1993 WL 79254 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

854 S.W.2d 499 (State v. Vincent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.