State v. Vincent
623 A.2d 1026, 225 Conn. 917, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 127
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 249 (AC 10688), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the search war[918] rant application stated probable cause to believe that a crime had been committed?
“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in not deciding (1) whether the seizure of the revolver, the subject of the prosecution, was ‘inadvertent’ under the ‘plain view’ exception to the warrant requirement, and (2) whether the Connecticut constitution requires ‘inadvertence’ under the ‘plain view’ exception even if the United States constitution does not?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Vincent, 623 A.2d 1026, 225 Conn. 917, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 127 (Colo. 1993).
623 A.2d 1026 (State v. Vincent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Vincent
640 A.2d 94 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)