State v. Villa

811 P.2d 149, 107 Or. App. 366, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 802
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 22, 1991
Docket88-3772-B-C-2; CA A63065
StatusPublished

This text of 811 P.2d 149 (State v. Villa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Villa, 811 P.2d 149, 107 Or. App. 366, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 802 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from an order revoking her probation and sentencing her to 10 years in prison. She contends that she did not knowingly or intelligently waive her right to counsel at the revocation hearing.1 The state concedes that she is right, and we agree.

Reversed and remanded for a new hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
811 P.2d 149, 107 Or. App. 366, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-villa-orctapp-1991.