State v. Vild, Unpublished Decision (10-26-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Vild, Unpublished Decision (10-26-2007)

2007 Ohio 5851

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 26, 2007

DocketNos. 87742 and 87965.

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2007 Ohio 5851 (State v. Vild, Unpublished Decision (10-26-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Vild, Unpublished Decision (10-26-2007), 2007 Ohio 5851 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} John Vild has filed a timely application for reopening pursuant to App.R. 26(B). Vild is attempting to reopen the appellate judgment that was rendered in State v. Vild, Cuyahoga App. Nos. 87742 and 87965,2007-Ohio-987, which vacated the trial court's granting of a successive motion to withdraw a plea of guilty.

{¶ 2} Vild's counsel has filed a motion to dismiss the application for reopening, which demonstrates that Vild has died. See App.R. 29(A).

{¶ 3} Vild's application for reopening has been abated by death. SeeCleveland v. Nayman (April 24, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 76951, reopening disallowed (April 11, 2001), Motion No. 318974. Thus, a reopening of Vild's appeal is not appropriate.

{¶ 4} Application for reopening is denied.

COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J., and MARY J. BOYLE, J., CONCUR

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI